Being put in the Smithsonian Institution is perhaps the the most prestigious destination possible for any material object. The flag that is the star-spangled banner is in the Smithsonian. The Hope Diamond is in the Smithsonian. The ruby slippers Judy Garland wore in "The Wizard of Oz" is in the Smithsonian.
Now I can proudly say that I, too, am in The Smithsonian.
In particular, Smithsonian magazine is running a special issue on ``The 100 Most Significant Americans of All Time", with their rankings powered by our book Who's Bigger. It was an interesting exercise to come up with these rankings, because it is a challenge to define exactly who is an American. Did they have to be born here? Live most of their life here? Die here? Become a citizen?
The editor of this special issue (Tom Frail) broke our rankings into ten different subdomains, and provided a nice capsule biography and often-surprising picture for each of the chosen people (was Ronald Reagan really ever that young?). It is a fun read and easy entree to the Who's Bigger universe.
Monday, November 17, 2014
Thursday, November 13, 2014
Avery Fisher and his Hall
Today's news has an interesting story about how the family of businessman / donor Avery Fisher reached a settlement with the management of Lincoln Center to take his name off of the New York Philharmonic's Avery Fisher Hall to free it up for a new, presumably much larger donor.
This story resonates with me for two reasons. First, attaching your name to an important building is an excellent way to retain historical significance. Our rankings puts Avery Fisher at 199,082, meaning he ranks among the top quarter of Wikipedia figures. The company where he made his money (Fisher Radio) has long since been absorbed, and his name is no longer that of an active brand. Giving up his name on the building will condemn his fame to decline with time consistently with other mortals.
Avery Fisher in important to me because my father Morris Skiena worked for him as a radio repairman early on, at a time when Fisher had only three employees. Indeed in this 1946 Fortune Magazine article about Fisher, my father is the guy at the bench with his back to you on the lower left of page 161.
My father knew the future was television, not radio. So, by employing the business sense that Skienas are famous for, Dad left the company before Fisher hit it big to become a television repairman. I get reminded of this story every time I pass Avery Fisher Hall. I still call other city landmarks by their old, honest names: the PanAm Building, the Triborough Bridge, and the RCA building in Rockefeller Center, so I suspect it will always be Avery Fisher Hall to be regardless of which swell ultimately coughs up the dough to choose its name.
This story resonates with me for two reasons. First, attaching your name to an important building is an excellent way to retain historical significance. Our rankings puts Avery Fisher at 199,082, meaning he ranks among the top quarter of Wikipedia figures. The company where he made his money (Fisher Radio) has long since been absorbed, and his name is no longer that of an active brand. Giving up his name on the building will condemn his fame to decline with time consistently with other mortals.
Avery Fisher in important to me because my father Morris Skiena worked for him as a radio repairman early on, at a time when Fisher had only three employees. Indeed in this 1946 Fortune Magazine article about Fisher, my father is the guy at the bench with his back to you on the lower left of page 161.
My father knew the future was television, not radio. So, by employing the business sense that Skienas are famous for, Dad left the company before Fisher hit it big to become a television repairman. I get reminded of this story every time I pass Avery Fisher Hall. I still call other city landmarks by their old, honest names: the PanAm Building, the Triborough Bridge, and the RCA building in Rockefeller Center, so I suspect it will always be Avery Fisher Hall to be regardless of which swell ultimately coughs up the dough to choose its name.
Thursday, September 18, 2014
I was a Rebel at the Wisest Place on Earth
On Labor Day I gave my Who's Bigger talk to students and faculty at the University of Virginia College in Wise, Virginia as part of their ``Digitial Rebel'' series. Thanks to Daniel Ray and the rest of their faculty for very gracious hosting. It was an interesting experience, and from their questions I can safely assert that I never spoke to a Wiser audience.
This visit was particularly meaningful to me because I received my undergraduate degree at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville, which serves as the mother ship to Wise. It was nice to see connections in the names of the sport teams (the Cavaliers), the school logo (a representation of Thomas Jefferson [10]'s Rotunda building at UVa, and even an architectural remnant left after the 1895 Rotunda fire.
Wise is a small town is in the Appalachian Mountains not far from the corner where Virginia meets Tennessee and Kentucky. Life there appears quite different than living in Manhattan, but has its own advantages. Driving around town, I noticed a sign proclaiming actor George C. Scott [12170] as a local product. Our rankings mark him as the biggest of the Wise men.
Monday, July 28, 2014
Star Sighting: Who's Bigger at Cafe Boulud?
My wife and I took advantage of a beautiful New York evening with kids away at camp to dine tonight al fresco at Cafe Boulud, one of the nicest restaurants in the city. We tried to take advantage of Restaurant Week prices to learn they apply only to lunch, but that is not the story I am trying to tell.
As we finished our entree, we were surprised to see television talk show host Charlie Rose sit down at the table next to us. And then at the next table sat down William Goldman, the Academy Award-winning screenwriter of Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, and countless other prominent films. They chatted together like old friends, as perhaps they are.
This kind of thing doesn't happen to us much, but I couldn't help wondering: Who's Bigger? Through the miracle of cell phone technology I looked it up. They are amazingly similar. Our algorithms rank Charlie Rose at 13,760, a bit ahead of William Goldman at 15,213.
I would like to report that I told them their rankings, which they found fascinating, and that I am now booked to appear on the next Charlie Rose Show. The truth is, I behaved like a proper New Yorker and let them eat.
I guess I am better at network algorithms like PageRank than networking. At least I hope so.
As we finished our entree, we were surprised to see television talk show host Charlie Rose sit down at the table next to us. And then at the next table sat down William Goldman, the Academy Award-winning screenwriter of Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, and countless other prominent films. They chatted together like old friends, as perhaps they are.
This kind of thing doesn't happen to us much, but I couldn't help wondering: Who's Bigger? Through the miracle of cell phone technology I looked it up. They are amazingly similar. Our algorithms rank Charlie Rose at 13,760, a bit ahead of William Goldman at 15,213.
I would like to report that I told them their rankings, which they found fascinating, and that I am now booked to appear on the next Charlie Rose Show. The truth is, I behaved like a proper New Yorker and let them eat.
I guess I am better at network algorithms like PageRank than networking. At least I hope so.
The Biggest Americans (The Atlantic)
Identifying the most historically significant figures in American History is a natural question for our analysis methods. Indeed, our rankings will be used to fuel a special issue of The Smithsonian magazine this fall on the top figures in American history. Look for details to come in a future post.
But here we react to a special issue on the 100 most influential figures in American history under the aegis of Ross Douthat, which appeared in the The Atlantic Monthly in December 2006. Their methodology was based a historian poll, where rankings from ten historians were combined into a single consensus ranking. This inspires the obvious question of how our top 100 Americans compare to the Atlantic's choices.
To proceed, one must move past the definitional issues of who qualifies as American. Is an explorer like Columbus American? A naturalized citizen like Albert Einstein? Someone born in the U.S. who established themselves elsewhere, like the poet T.S. Eliot? Our opinions on these matters are, respectively no, yes, and no, to be broadly consistent with the Atlantic.
How did the historians do? Pretty well, since there is great overlap between our rankings and theirs. Fully fifty of The Atlantic's top 100 rank in our top 100, with another twenty listed in our second hundred candidates. Our top three figures are exactly their top three figures (Lincoln, Washington, and Jefferson), in the same order. The rank correlation between the orders we rank their top 100 is 0.654, demonstrated by the dot plot below:
Perhaps the most important difference between our two rankings is how we deal with the Presidents of the United States. Our rankings put 41 of the 43 men to serve as president in our 100 most significant historical figures (our apologies to Jimmy Carter and Chester Alan Arthur, who just got nosed out). By contrast, only 17 presidents made the Atlantic's top 100 Americans.
We think this reflects a clear editorial judgement on their part: it seems less interesting for readers when half your list is stuffed with presidents. Ten of their top 20 Americans were presidents, yet only two of the men ranked 51 to 100 (including Richard Nixon sitting provocatively at 99). One can hear the summons for diversity and controversy (Ralph Nader?) affecting the historian's better judgement. My guess is that the historians were confronted with a pre-selected group of figures, who they generally ordered in a sensible manner.
Here are the ten Atlantic figures with the weakest Who's Bigger rankings. Three are journalist/media figures (Gallup, Bennett, and Lippmann), while three others are scientists (Salk, Watson, and Mead):
By contrast, here are the ten highest ranking Americans missing from the Atlantic:
Name WB
Ranking
George_W._Bush 36 (our algorithm's most-regretted ranking)
Edgar_Allan_Poe 54
John_F._Kennedy 71
Nikola_Tesla 93
Grover_Cleveland 98
Andrew_Johnson 105
Barack_Obama 111 (admittedly, elected after the Atlantic article)
Bill_Clinton 115
Madonna 121
Bob_Dylan 130
These might not personally all be my choices for the ten most historically-significant missing Americans. But I have no doubt that I would put our team ahead of the Atlantic's in any game of Who's Bigger.
But here we react to a special issue on the 100 most influential figures in American history under the aegis of Ross Douthat, which appeared in the The Atlantic Monthly in December 2006. Their methodology was based a historian poll, where rankings from ten historians were combined into a single consensus ranking. This inspires the obvious question of how our top 100 Americans compare to the Atlantic's choices.
To proceed, one must move past the definitional issues of who qualifies as American. Is an explorer like Columbus American? A naturalized citizen like Albert Einstein? Someone born in the U.S. who established themselves elsewhere, like the poet T.S. Eliot? Our opinions on these matters are, respectively no, yes, and no, to be broadly consistent with the Atlantic.
How did the historians do? Pretty well, since there is great overlap between our rankings and theirs. Fully fifty of The Atlantic's top 100 rank in our top 100, with another twenty listed in our second hundred candidates. Our top three figures are exactly their top three figures (Lincoln, Washington, and Jefferson), in the same order. The rank correlation between the orders we rank their top 100 is 0.654, demonstrated by the dot plot below:
Perhaps the most important difference between our two rankings is how we deal with the Presidents of the United States. Our rankings put 41 of the 43 men to serve as president in our 100 most significant historical figures (our apologies to Jimmy Carter and Chester Alan Arthur, who just got nosed out). By contrast, only 17 presidents made the Atlantic's top 100 Americans.
We think this reflects a clear editorial judgement on their part: it seems less interesting for readers when half your list is stuffed with presidents. Ten of their top 20 Americans were presidents, yet only two of the men ranked 51 to 100 (including Richard Nixon sitting provocatively at 99). One can hear the summons for diversity and controversy (Ralph Nader?) affecting the historian's better judgement. My guess is that the historians were confronted with a pre-selected group of figures, who they generally ordered in a sensible manner.
Here are the ten Atlantic figures with the weakest Who's Bigger rankings. Three are journalist/media figures (Gallup, Bennett, and Lippmann), while three others are scientists (Salk, Watson, and Mead):
| Name | Atlantic Ranking | WB Ranking | Norm A Rank | Norm WB Rank |
| George_Gallup | 83 | 29736 | 82 | 100 |
| James_Gordon_Bennett,_Sr. | 69 | 19473 | 68 | 99 |
| Benjamin_Spock | 88 | 8638 | 87 | 98 |
| Walter_Lippmann | 90 | 5854 | 89 | 97 |
| Betty_Friedan | 78 | 5553 | 77 | 96 |
| Lyman_Beecher | 92 | 5203 | 91 | 95 |
| Sam_Walton | 73 | 4923 | 72 | 94 |
| Jonas_Salk | 34 | 3775 | 33 | 93 |
| James_D._Watson | 68 | 3619 | 67 | 92 |
| Margaret_Mead | 82 | 3025 | 81 | 91 |
By contrast, here are the ten highest ranking Americans missing from the Atlantic:
Name WB
Ranking
George_W._Bush 36 (our algorithm's most-regretted ranking)
Edgar_Allan_Poe 54
John_F._Kennedy 71
Nikola_Tesla 93
Grover_Cleveland 98
Andrew_Johnson 105
Barack_Obama 111 (admittedly, elected after the Atlantic article)
Bill_Clinton 115
Madonna 121
Bob_Dylan 130
These might not personally all be my choices for the ten most historically-significant missing Americans. But I have no doubt that I would put our team ahead of the Atlantic's in any game of Who's Bigger.
Wednesday, April 23, 2014
Re-ranking the Pantheon
At the suggestion of Cesar Hidalgo, the leader of the Pantheon project, we repeated our previous analysis restricted to the top 1000 people in the Pantheon rankings. This better captures the people their rankings think are important, so differences in our relative rankings become more meaningful.
First we look at the people from this pool who our methods rank higher than Pantheon. By definition, all of these people will be highly regarded by both of our rankings. It is clear that we favor American and British leaders higher than they do, because we analyze only the English Wikipedia :
860 907 47 Woodrow Wilson U.S. President
841 996 155 Edward I of England British King
776 961 185 Leonhard Euler Mathematician
674 697 23 Theodore Roosevelt U.S. President
634 799 165 John Milton British Poet/Philosopher
600 985 385 Alexander II of Russia Russian Czar
583 789 206 Edward VI of England British King
556 666 110 Dwight D. Eisenhower U.S. President
553 970 417 John Dewey American Educator
550 954 404 Alexander I of Russia Russian Czar
542 636 94 Harry S. Truman U.S. President
539 654 115 Bill Clinton U.S. President
538 889 351 Francis I of France French King
536 936 400 Soren Kierkegaard Danish Philosopher
530 563 33 Charles Dickens British Writer
524 594 70 William the Conqueror British King
509 815 306 Jacques Cartier French explorer of America
505 742 237 Henry IV of France French King
503 677 174 Geoffrey Chaucer British Writer
498 616 118 Lewis Carroll British Writer
495 762 267 Alfred the Great British King
486 962 476 Eleanor of Aquitaine French/British Queen Consort
446 809 363 George H. W. Bush U.S. President
442 983 541 Archduke Franz Ferdinand Proximate cause of WWI
441 900 459 John Wayne U.S. actor and "Duke"
439 545 106 Alexander Graham Bell Inventor of the telephone
First we look at the people from this pool who our methods rank higher than Pantheon. By definition, all of these people will be highly regarded by both of our rankings. It is clear that we favor American and British leaders higher than they do, because we analyze only the English Wikipedia :
860 907 47 Woodrow Wilson U.S. President
841 996 155 Edward I of England British King
776 961 185 Leonhard Euler Mathematician
674 697 23 Theodore Roosevelt U.S. President
634 799 165 John Milton British Poet/Philosopher
600 985 385 Alexander II of Russia Russian Czar
583 789 206 Edward VI of England British King
556 666 110 Dwight D. Eisenhower U.S. President
553 970 417 John Dewey American Educator
550 954 404 Alexander I of Russia Russian Czar
542 636 94 Harry S. Truman U.S. President
539 654 115 Bill Clinton U.S. President
538 889 351 Francis I of France French King
536 936 400 Soren Kierkegaard Danish Philosopher
530 563 33 Charles Dickens British Writer
524 594 70 William the Conqueror British King
509 815 306 Jacques Cartier French explorer of America
505 742 237 Henry IV of France French King
503 677 174 Geoffrey Chaucer British Writer
498 616 118 Lewis Carroll British Writer
495 762 267 Alfred the Great British King
486 962 476 Eleanor of Aquitaine French/British Queen Consort
446 809 363 George H. W. Bush U.S. President
442 983 541 Archduke Franz Ferdinand Proximate cause of WWI
441 900 459 John Wayne U.S. actor and "Duke"
439 545 106 Alexander Graham Bell Inventor of the telephone
Still, these are figures who are generally quite familiar to me: I've heard of all of them, although I would not be confident in my ability to tell one Alexander from the other. By contrast, there are several figures among the ones they rank much higher than we do who I could not place, or place as celebrities more than historical figures:
-7960 673 8633 Justin Bieber Teenaged popular singer
-8008 943 8951 Haruki Murakami Japanese novelist
-8460 850 9310 Carus Short-ruling Roman Emperor
-8463 765 9228 Antisthenes Greek Philosopher
-8601 880 9481 Jenna Jameson American porn star
-8630 734 9364 Anacreon Greek Poet
-8746 363 9109 Anaximenes of Miletus Greek Philosopher
-8836 352 9188 James son of Alphaeus One of Jesus' twelve apolstles
-8932 919 9851 Polykleitos Greek sculptor
-9008 934 9942 Lysippos Greek sculptor
-9674 851 10525 Carinus Roman Emperor with Carus (above)
-9866 671 10537 Hor-Aha Egyptian Pharaoh
-10628 920 11548 Kaka Brazilian soccer player
-10696 775 11471 Orhan Pamuk Turkish novelist
-11153 839 11992 Abu Nuwas Classical Arabic poet
-11722 906 12628 Trebonianus Gallus Short-ruling Roman Emperor
-11771 560 12331 Praxiteles Greek sculptor
-11834 368 12202 Vitellius Very short-ruling Roman Emperor
-13291 607 13898 Gaius Maecenas Roman political advisor
-14507 701 15208 Milan Kundera Contemporary Czech novelist
-14571 843 15414 Emir Kusturica Bosnian filmmaker
-16783 610 17393 Paulo Coelho Brazilian novelist
-19060 820 19880 Monica Bellucci Italian actress and model
-21652 737 22389 Francois Villon French poet of the Middle Ages
-22604 974 23578 Pedro Almodovar Spanish Film director
-22754 935 23689 Quintillus Short-lived Roman Emperor
-26427 963 27390 Jean Reno French actor
This roster makes clear the differences in our models for aging historical reputations. About half of these historically-overvalued people are relatively minor figures from ancient times: short-lived Emperors and second-tier philosophers/poets/artists. Many of the rest are contemporary celebrities who don't really belong in anyone's top thousand historical figures, like porn star Jenna Jameson.
There are also a few international artists of real stature (including Orhan Pamuk, Milan Kundera, and Pedro Almodvar) who might be undervalued by the English Wikipedia relative to international editions. Still, I think our rankings place them in the right order of magnitude.
Wednesday, April 16, 2014
Ranking the Pantheon
A previous post described the MIT Pantheon, another project which used Wikipedia data to rank historical figures. We (meaning Charles, of course) extracted their rankings and matched them to our historical significance rankings, so we could compare them. There is some subtlety in algorithmic name matching, such as determining whether our "Jesus" is the same person as their "Jesus Christ", but we succeeded in matching 10,116 of the Pantheon names to our Who's Bigger rankings. This is roughly 90% of the total, providing a reasonable basis for comparison.
First off: it is clear that there is substantial agreement among our placement of historical figures, with a Spearman rank correlation of 0.65 between us and them. Both sets of rankings incorporate aging as part of the methodology, so much of this agreement rests on our preferences for the tried and true. The Who's Bigger rankings of these figures have a rank correlation of 0.58 with year-of-birth (older historical figures being more highly ranked), while the comparable number is 0.53 with Pantheon.
More revealing is to look at the extremes: the figures whom we assign very different ranks from them. In particular, we computed the difference between our ranks (Pantheon - us) and present the figures with the largest and smallest differences. This is not a perfect statistic, since Pantheon ranks less than 12,000 people while our numbers go well above 800,000. But it is revealing none the less.
Diff Panrank BigRank Name Who's Dat?
10120 10521 401 'John Marshall' Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court
10058 11184 1126 'Donald Bradman' Great Cricket champion
10027 10823 796 'William H. Seward' U.S. Secretary of State (bought Alaska)
9963 11077 1114 'Gough Whitlam' Australian Prime Minister
9933 10812 879 'John Churchill 1st Duke of Marlborough' English Statesman
9915 10802 887 'George Washington Carver' African-American Inventor
9886 10405 519 'Tipu Sultan' Ruler of the Kingdom of Mysore
9735 10146 411 'John Jay' Early U.S. Statesman
9536 9935 399 'John C. Calhoun' U.S. Senator /VP (nullification)
9454 9886 432 'Susan B. Anthony' U.S. Suffragist (women's right to vote)
9439 11243 1804 'Alexander Mackenzie' Second Prime Minister of Canada
9243 10064 821 'Abigail Adams' Wife of President John Adams
9215 10729 1514 'Robert Menzies' Longest serving Australian Prime Min.
9207 10917 1710 'Robert Byrd' Long-serving U.S. Senator
9175 10406 1231 'Sojourner Truth' African-American abolitionist
9171 10562 1391 'Lucille Ball' TV Comedian (I Love Lucy)
9171 9330 159 'John A. Macdonald' First Prime Minister of Canada
9165 10466 1301 'Edmund Barton' First Prime Minister of Australia
9130 10318 1188 'Mary Todd Lincoln' Wife of President Abraham Lincoln
9008 10086 1078 'Svetlana Kuznetsova' Russian tennis star
Diff Panrank BigRank Name Who's Dat?
First off: it is clear that there is substantial agreement among our placement of historical figures, with a Spearman rank correlation of 0.65 between us and them. Both sets of rankings incorporate aging as part of the methodology, so much of this agreement rests on our preferences for the tried and true. The Who's Bigger rankings of these figures have a rank correlation of 0.58 with year-of-birth (older historical figures being more highly ranked), while the comparable number is 0.53 with Pantheon.
More revealing is to look at the extremes: the figures whom we assign very different ranks from them. In particular, we computed the difference between our ranks (Pantheon - us) and present the figures with the largest and smallest differences. This is not a perfect statistic, since Pantheon ranks less than 12,000 people while our numbers go well above 800,000. But it is revealing none the less.
Diff Panrank BigRank Name Who's Dat?
10120 10521 401 'John Marshall' Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court
10058 11184 1126 'Donald Bradman' Great Cricket champion
10027 10823 796 'William H. Seward' U.S. Secretary of State (bought Alaska)
9963 11077 1114 'Gough Whitlam' Australian Prime Minister
9933 10812 879 'John Churchill 1st Duke of Marlborough' English Statesman
9915 10802 887 'George Washington Carver' African-American Inventor
9886 10405 519 'Tipu Sultan' Ruler of the Kingdom of Mysore
9735 10146 411 'John Jay' Early U.S. Statesman
9536 9935 399 'John C. Calhoun' U.S. Senator /VP (nullification)
9454 9886 432 'Susan B. Anthony' U.S. Suffragist (women's right to vote)
9439 11243 1804 'Alexander Mackenzie' Second Prime Minister of Canada
9243 10064 821 'Abigail Adams' Wife of President John Adams
9215 10729 1514 'Robert Menzies' Longest serving Australian Prime Min.
9207 10917 1710 'Robert Byrd' Long-serving U.S. Senator
9175 10406 1231 'Sojourner Truth' African-American abolitionist
9171 10562 1391 'Lucille Ball' TV Comedian (I Love Lucy)
9171 9330 159 'John A. Macdonald' First Prime Minister of Canada
9165 10466 1301 'Edmund Barton' First Prime Minister of Australia
9130 10318 1188 'Mary Todd Lincoln' Wife of President Abraham Lincoln
9008 10086 1078 'Svetlana Kuznetsova' Russian tennis star
Almost all of these figures are from the English-speaking world: United States, Canada, Australia, Great Britain. It is no surprise that our methods (which only analyze the English language Wikipedia) generally rank these people higher than Pantheon (which analyzes editions from all languages). I personally recognize 14 of the twenty names here, and think they are generally quite Big, although I cringe a bit where some of our rankings are clearly too high (particularly Sultan and Kuznetsova).
The major American figures here are generally from the 19th century, which makes sense given the difference between our aging model and the one employed in Pantheon (full disclosure: Pantheon has recently changed its rankings, and what we have here may not be their current rankings). In particular, our rankings have fully discounted a historical figure 160 years after birth, while they continued historical discounting arbitrarily far into the past). Thus 19th century figures have generally achieved steady state by our analysis, so we value them relatively higher than Pantheon would.
The other side of the coin are the people who Pantheon ranks very much higher than we do. The figures below all ranked in the bottom half of Wikipedia figures by our analysis, yet were identified by Pantheon among the 12,000 most interesting figures for analysis:
The major American figures here are generally from the 19th century, which makes sense given the difference between our aging model and the one employed in Pantheon (full disclosure: Pantheon has recently changed its rankings, and what we have here may not be their current rankings). In particular, our rankings have fully discounted a historical figure 160 years after birth, while they continued historical discounting arbitrarily far into the past). Thus 19th century figures have generally achieved steady state by our analysis, so we value them relatively higher than Pantheon would.
The other side of the coin are the people who Pantheon ranks very much higher than we do. The figures below all ranked in the bottom half of Wikipedia figures by our analysis, yet were identified by Pantheon among the 12,000 most interesting figures for analysis:
Diff Panrank BigRank Name Who's Dat?
-472241 8052 480293 'Alexandra Stan' Romanian singer and model
-484757 11086 495843 'Serge Haroche' French Nobel Prize winner in Physics, 2012
-493874 9471 503345 'Lola Pagnani' Italian actress
-495688 11148 506836 'Stephane Lannoy' French soccer referee
-497360 10133 507493 'Olivier Giroud' French soccer player
-517354 11160 528514 'Wouter Weylandt' Belgian professional cyclist killed in 2011
-525449 9576 535025 'Nathalia Dill' Brazilian television actress
-525475 10601 536076 'Milos Zeman' Current president of the Czech Republic
-525633 11232 536865 'David J. Wineland' Nobel Prize winner in Physics, 2012
-526148 10774 536922 'Gianluca Ramazzotti' Italian singer-songwriter
-555909 11029 566938 'Linda Maria Baros' Contemporary French poet
-558970 10942 569912 'Jules A. Hoffmann' French Nobel Prize winner in Medicine, 2011
-573789 11144 584933 'Pastora Soler' Spanish Eurovision singer
-581161 11286 592447 'Sun Yang' Chinese Olympic swimmer
-601660 10310 611970 'Kevin Grobkreutz' German soccer player
-607491 11318 618809 'Missy Franklin' American Olympic Swimmer, 2012
-613223 11278 624501 'Brian Kobilka' American Nobel Prize winner in Medicine, 2011
-632278 11224 643502 'Lobsang Sangay' Prime minister in exile for Tibet
-685152 10556 695708 'Bernice Bejo' French-Argentine actress
-689256 11296 700552 'Vaclav Pilar' Czech soccer player
-693543 9577 703120 'Raphael Varane' French soccer player
-717448 11231 728679 'Ludmilla Radchenko' Russian model and active
-751460 10907 762367 'Anton Lamazares' Contemporary Spanish painter
-803441 11270 814711 'Petr Jiracek' Czech soccer player
These people are generally Europeans, who have the easiest time rising to the Pantheon Wikipedia language threshold. They are also all very contemporary figures, many of who achieved their greatest renown for achievements occurring after the Wikipedia edition we analyzed in our rankings (October 11, 2010), so presumably they would be ranked somewhat higher if we reran our analysis today.
However, I personally only recognized one name here, and it required some prompting. Bernice Bejo was the lead actress in "The Artist" which, by the way, was a wonderful picture. These people would generally not be in my 12,000 most significant (or famous) historical figures, but Pantheon's objectives are somewhat different than ours. My guess is the both groups are content with our ranking differences given our different motivations.
These people are generally Europeans, who have the easiest time rising to the Pantheon Wikipedia language threshold. They are also all very contemporary figures, many of who achieved their greatest renown for achievements occurring after the Wikipedia edition we analyzed in our rankings (October 11, 2010), so presumably they would be ranked somewhat higher if we reran our analysis today.
However, I personally only recognized one name here, and it required some prompting. Bernice Bejo was the lead actress in "The Artist" which, by the way, was a wonderful picture. These people would generally not be in my 12,000 most significant (or famous) historical figures, but Pantheon's objectives are somewhat different than ours. My guess is the both groups are content with our ranking differences given our different motivations.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

